2023-09-21 13:21:13 +10:00
|
|
|
IfcFM
|
|
|
|
|
=====
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-27 18:21:35 +10:00
|
|
|
**Facility managers** (FM) need to know a lot of information about the building
|
|
|
|
|
in order to maintain the facility and its assets effectively. This includes
|
|
|
|
|
information about spaces, services, and key equipment, such as who to call when
|
|
|
|
|
things break, what the model number is, the warranty period, associated
|
|
|
|
|
certificates, what valve or circuit breaker must be shut off prior to
|
|
|
|
|
maintenance, and a punch list of periodic maintenance tasks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditionally, this information is collected in numerous operations and
|
|
|
|
|
maintenance (O&M) manuals. IFC can collect this information incrementally
|
|
|
|
|
throughout the design development, construction, and commissioning stages of a
|
|
|
|
|
project. IFC's standardised and rich digital relationships can describe the
|
|
|
|
|
information that facility managers need. The most popular requirements
|
|
|
|
|
specification for IFC-based digital FM data is known as **COBie 2.4**.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Despite already requesting and receiving IFC deliverables, many clients still
|
|
|
|
|
request FM data in a spreadsheet format. Unfortunately, many of these
|
|
|
|
|
spreadsheet deliverables are not produced from IFC databases. This defeats the
|
|
|
|
|
purpose of BIM: asset data is no longer richly stored using international
|
|
|
|
|
standards and the BIM model may no longer be trusted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IfcFM is a highly standards-compliant tool to convert FM data in IFC databases
|
|
|
|
|
to spreadsheets and other machine readable formats, such as ODS, XLSX, CSV,
|
|
|
|
|
Pandas, XML, and JSON. These formats may then be easily read, audited, or
|
|
|
|
|
imported into technologies that cannot work with IFC natively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supported data standards
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IfcFM assumes that you want to convert IFC data grouped into one or more
|
|
|
|
|
categories of data (e.g. list of assets, list of spare parts, list of documents
|
|
|
|
|
and certificates, etc). Each category of data includes a list or schedule of
|
|
|
|
|
information, and may reference information in other categories. In a
|
|
|
|
|
spreadsheet format, each category correlates to a worksheet, where each
|
|
|
|
|
worksheet focuses on one type of data and has multiple columns (e.g. name of
|
|
|
|
|
manufacturer, point of contact, etc). There are four data standards compatible
|
|
|
|
|
with this data structure that IfcFM supports:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **COBie 2.4**: the most popular requirements specification for FM data
|
|
|
|
|
currently in use first published in 2007. It specifies requirements to
|
|
|
|
|
collect almost 20 categories of data, focusing on maintainable equipment and
|
|
|
|
|
finishes. It is published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, National
|
|
|
|
|
Building Information Model (NBIMS-US) standard, version 2, chapter 2.4, and
|
|
|
|
|
in British Standard BS 1192-4:2014.
|
|
|
|
|
- **COBie 3.0**: an update to **COBie 2.4** published by the National Building
|
|
|
|
|
Information Model (NBIMS-US) standard. Unlike **COBie 2.4**, it is not a
|
|
|
|
|
British Standard nor developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
|
|
|
|
|
- **AOH-BSEM**: a draft specification by buildingSMART based on the lessons
|
|
|
|
|
learned from the implementation of **COBie 2.4**, as part of a modular
|
|
|
|
|
approach to asset data exchange that supports not just buildings, but
|
|
|
|
|
infrastructure projects too. **AOH-BSEM** is set to supersede **COBIE 3.0**
|
|
|
|
|
with a focus primarily on equipment maintenance.
|
|
|
|
|
- **Vanilla IFC**: Regardless of any "named" requirement such as above, IFC
|
|
|
|
|
itself contains a number of standardised property sets and object types
|
|
|
|
|
related to assets, warranties, manufacturers, and construction /
|
|
|
|
|
installation. As expected, the majority of these are already referenced in
|
|
|
|
|
named standards. "Vanilla" IFC offers a "specification agnostic" approach
|
|
|
|
|
towards facility management data collection.
|