Added new panel. in shader graph N-panel that allows you to create fully GLTF and IFC compatible shader graphs by just tweaking parameters from the panel. Note that it's still saved to IFC only when you hit "Save Current Style", before that it's still just stored in blender.
https://imgur.com/a/vmkoLPH
The premise is that if you want to have non-external style you'd be able to create it entirely from this panel - so there will no need to guess or to remember which parameters from the graph are supported by IFC and which are not.
It's still work in progress, still need to polish it, add support for more reflectance methods and add suport for textures (need to be able to import/export it with .ifc and set them from this panel).
Taking into account that now we have error messages if user will try to remove the last material layer which would make layer set invalid ifc.
FAILED test/bim/test_feature.py::test_remove_material_set_layer - AssertionError: Failed to run operator bpy.ops.bim.remove_layer(layer=IfcStore.get_file().by_id(93).MaterialLayers[...
Some bim test was failing because of it
FAILED test/bim/test_feature.py::test_assign_material__material_profile_set - AssertionError: No material Default found in profiled materials: []
FAILED test/bim/test_feature.py::test_export_ifc__with_basic_contents_and_saving_as_a_relative_path - AssertionError: Value is C:\IfcOpenShell\src\blenderbim\test\files\temp\export.ifc
Duplicated objects were not able to have their own collection after 586707dd2
Also fixed bim test
FAILED test/bim/test_feature.py::test_copy_a_storey - AssertionError: assert 'IfcBuildingStorey/My Storey.001' in ['IfcBuildingStorey/My Storey']
Unlinking was using copied object name for the unlinked object instead of the original one.
So it worked like Cube -> IfcWall/Cube -> Cube.001 and bim test was failing:
FAILED test/bim/test_feature.py::test_unlink_object - AssertionError: The object "Cube" does not exist
1) Explicitly set empty ifc project not to load demo library - was still loading because it was using my default scene which caused errors.
2) typo in dimension check assertion message
Fixed error that was occuring if you try to import .ifc file where spatial element contains only grid and will use advanced mode, filter mode = "IFC Class" and check "Filter Spatial Elements".
Error occured because spatial element was filtered out but then when ifc grid was created and importer to find a spatial element based collection for the grid it couldn't find it.
Traceback:
Error: Python: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "\blenderbim\bim\module\project\operator.py", line 595, in execute
ifc_importer.execute()
File "\blenderbim\bim\import_ifc.py", line 260, in execute
self.place_objects_in_collections()
File "\blenderbim\bim\import_ifc.py", line 1494, in place_objects_in_collections
self.place_object_in_collection(self.file.by_id(ifc_definition_id), obj)
File "\blenderbim\bim\import_ifc.py", line 1498, in place_object_in_collection
self.place_object_in_decomposition_collection(element, obj)
File "\blenderbim\bim\import_ifc.py", line 1517, in place_object_in_decomposition_collection
return self.place_object_in_spatial_decomposition_collection(element, obj)
File "\blenderbim\bim\import_ifc.py", line 1545, in place_object_in_spatial_decomposition_collection
self.collections[container.GlobalId].children.link(grid_collection)
KeyError: '33AiKftFj2aAf2MqQr5Gs7'
In ifc2x3 IfcProject is not IfcContext because there is no IfcContext in ifc2x3 and it was causing the error below on .ifc import with filtered spatial elements.
Also added small refactor
Traceback:
Error: Python: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "\blenderbim\bim\module\project\operator.py", line 595, in execute
ifc_importer.execute()
File "\blenderbim\bim\import_ifc.py", line 253, in execute
self.create_spatial_elements()
File "\blenderbim\bim\import_ifc.py", line 688, in create_spatial_elements
self.create_generic_elements(self.spatial_elements)
File "\blenderbim\bim\import_ifc.py", line 698, in create_generic_elements
products = self.create_products(elements)
File "\blenderbim\bim\import_ifc.py", line 717, in create_products
iterator = ifcopenshell.geom.iterator(settings, self.file, multiprocessing.cpu_count(), include=products)
File "\blenderbim\libs\site\packages\ifcopenshell\geom\main.py", line 99, in __init__
raise ValueError("include and exclude need to be an aggregate of IfcProduct?")
ValueError: include and exclude need to be an aggregate of IfcProduct?
Example - https://i.imgur.com/f4Yi3MR.png
Now changing style type should be a bit more intuitive - previously there were no button and it wasn't possible to change style type for all selected objects / changing style type for the entire scene were hidden in N-panel Miscellaneous section.
Now it also able to change style type for all blender materials, even the ones that don't have any objects using them (wasn't possible before 7c0c934b4)
`ifcmerge` is asymmetrical. When both branches have new entities, either
local or remote step Ids need to be renumbered to resolve the merge
conflict.
If the remote branch is 'origin/main' or 'main' we preserve remote Ids,
otherwise we preserve local Ids.
This should support a workflow where a local 'main' branch is kept
pristine, but other local branches are treated as disposable; it should
also support a workflow where multiple authors access a shared 'origin'.
Andrej730
