mirror of
https://github.com/JuliaFEM/JuliaFEM.jl.git
synced 2026-09-17 09:12:09 +00:00
docs: Reorganize documentation into three-tier structure
**Three Manuals for Three Audiences:** 1. **User Manual** (docs/user/) - "Just Get It Done" - For end users, engineers, students - Simple, practical, step-by-step - Quick start, tutorials, examples, troubleshooting - Philosophy: Show me how to solve my problem 2. **Contributor Manual** (docs/contributor/) - "Show Me the Code" - For developers, contributors, advanced users - Technical, detailed, design rationale - Testing, architecture, performance, CI/CD - Philosophy: Explain HOW and WHY 3. **The JuliaFEM Book** (docs/book/) - "Let Me Show You How I Think" - For researchers, theory nerds, and Jukka - Comprehensive, educational, opinionated, personal - Math foundations, design philosophy, history, research - Philosophy: Mix theory, code, and personal experience **Reorganization:** - Moved: TESTING_PHILOSOPHY.md → contributor/testing_philosophy.md - Moved: STATUS.md → contributor/status.md - Moved: TEST_FIXES_NEEDED.md → contributor/test_fixes_needed.md - Moved: lagrange_basis_functions.md → book/lagrange_basis_functions.md - Moved: benchmarks/ → book/benchmarks/ - Created: docs/README.md (main index explaining structure) - Created: README.md in each section explaining audience and contents - Updated: All references in scripts and source files **Naming:** All docs now lowercase (testing_philosophy not TESTING_PHILOSOPHY) **Benefits:** - Clear separation of concerns - Users don't get overwhelmed with implementation details - Contributors get technical depth - Book preserves deep theory and personal insights - Each manual optimized for its audience **Next:** Populate each section with appropriate content
This commit is contained in:
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
|
||||
# - Version control shows what changed
|
||||
#
|
||||
# SEE:
|
||||
# - src/lagrange_basis_functions.md (mathematical explanation)
|
||||
# - docs/book/lagrange_basis_functions.md (mathematical explanation)
|
||||
# - scripts/generate_lagrange_basis.jl (generation script)
|
||||
# - src/basis/lagrange_generated.jl (output - do not edit manually!)
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,226 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Lagrange Basis Functions in JuliaFEM
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** November 9, 2025
|
||||
**Author:** JuliaFEM Development Team
|
||||
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
Lagrange basis functions are the foundation of the Finite Element Method. They provide a systematic way to construct polynomial interpolation functions that satisfy the **Kronecker delta property**: the basis function associated with node $i$ equals 1 at that node and 0 at all other nodes.
|
||||
|
||||
$$N_i(\mathbf{x}_j) = \delta_{ij} = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if } i = j \\ 0 & \text{if } i \neq j \end{cases}$$
|
||||
|
||||
This property makes it trivial to interpolate field values: $u(\mathbf{x}) = \sum_i u_i N_i(\mathbf{x})$ where $u_i$ are nodal values.
|
||||
|
||||
## Mathematical Foundation
|
||||
|
||||
### Vandermonde Matrix Method
|
||||
|
||||
Given:
|
||||
|
||||
- $n$ nodes with coordinates $\{\mathbf{x}_1, \mathbf{x}_2, \ldots, \mathbf{x}_n\}$ in reference element
|
||||
- A polynomial basis (ansatz) $\{p_1(\mathbf{x}), p_2(\mathbf{x}), \ldots, p_n(\mathbf{x})\}$
|
||||
|
||||
We seek coefficients $\alpha_{ij}$ such that:
|
||||
|
||||
$$N_i(\mathbf{x}) = \sum_{j=1}^{n} \alpha_{ij} p_j(\mathbf{x})$$
|
||||
|
||||
The Kronecker delta property gives us:
|
||||
|
||||
$$N_i(\mathbf{x}_k) = \sum_{j=1}^{n} \alpha_{ij} p_j(\mathbf{x}_k) = \delta_{ik}$$
|
||||
|
||||
This is a linear system: $\mathbf{V} \boldsymbol{\alpha}_i = \mathbf{e}_i$
|
||||
|
||||
Where the **Vandermonde matrix** is:
|
||||
|
||||
$$V_{kj} = p_j(\mathbf{x}_k)$$
|
||||
|
||||
And $\mathbf{e}_i$ is the $i$-th unit vector.
|
||||
|
||||
### Example: 1D Linear Element (Seg2)
|
||||
|
||||
**Ansatz:** $p(\xi) = 1 + \xi$ (complete linear polynomial)
|
||||
|
||||
**Nodes:** $\xi_1 = 0$, $\xi_2 = 1$
|
||||
|
||||
**Vandermonde matrix:**
|
||||
|
||||
$$\mathbf{V} = \begin{bmatrix}
|
||||
p_1(\xi_1) & p_2(\xi_1) \\
|
||||
p_1(\xi_2) & p_2(\xi_2)
|
||||
\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}
|
||||
1 & 0 \\
|
||||
1 & 1
|
||||
\end{bmatrix}$$
|
||||
|
||||
**Solve for $N_1$:** $\mathbf{V} \boldsymbol{\alpha}_1 = [1, 0]^T$
|
||||
|
||||
$$\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \alpha_{11} \\ \alpha_{12} \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}$$
|
||||
|
||||
Solution: $\alpha_{11} = 1$, $\alpha_{12} = -1$
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore: $N_1(\xi) = 1 \cdot 1 + (-1) \cdot \xi = 1 - \xi$ ✓
|
||||
|
||||
**Solve for $N_2$:** $\mathbf{V} \boldsymbol{\alpha}_2 = [0, 1]^T$
|
||||
|
||||
Solution: $\alpha_{21} = 0$, $\alpha_{22} = 1$
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore: $N_2(\xi) = 0 \cdot 1 + 1 \cdot \xi = \xi$ ✓
|
||||
|
||||
**Verification:**
|
||||
- $N_1(0) = 1$, $N_1(1) = 0$ ✓
|
||||
- $N_2(0) = 0$, $N_2(1) = 1$ ✓
|
||||
- $N_1(\xi) + N_2(\xi) = 1$ (partition of unity) ✓
|
||||
|
||||
## Polynomial Completeness
|
||||
|
||||
The ansatz polynomial must be **complete** to the desired order:
|
||||
|
||||
| Order | 1D | 2D | 3D | Nodes Required |
|
||||
|-------|----|----|-----|----------------|
|
||||
| Linear | $1 + \xi$ | $1 + \xi + \eta$ | $1 + \xi + \eta + \zeta$ | $d+1$ |
|
||||
| Quadratic | $1 + \xi + \xi^2$ | $1 + \xi + \eta + \xi^2 + \xi\eta + \eta^2$ | ... | $(d+1)(d+2)/2$ |
|
||||
|
||||
**Example for 2D Triangle (Tri3):**
|
||||
|
||||
Ansatz: $p(\xi, \eta) = 1 + \xi + \eta$ (complete linear in 2D)
|
||||
|
||||
This is the **minimal** complete polynomial for 3 nodes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation in JuliaFEM
|
||||
|
||||
### Automatic Generation Process
|
||||
|
||||
```julia
|
||||
# 1. Define element geometry
|
||||
coords = [(0.0, 0.0), (1.0, 0.0), (0.0, 1.0)] # Tri3 nodes
|
||||
|
||||
# 2. Define ansatz polynomial
|
||||
ansatz = :(1 + u + v) # Complete linear in 2D
|
||||
|
||||
# 3. Build Vandermonde matrix
|
||||
V[i,j] = eval_polynomial_term(ansatz_terms[j], coords[i])
|
||||
|
||||
# 4. For each node i:
|
||||
coeffs = V \ e_i # Solve linear system
|
||||
N_i = sum(coeffs[j] * ansatz_terms[j]) # Construct basis function
|
||||
|
||||
# 5. Symbolic differentiation
|
||||
∂N_i/∂ξ = differentiate(N_i, :u)
|
||||
∂N_i/∂η = differentiate(N_i, :v)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Why This Works
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Completeness:** Ansatz spans full polynomial space of given order
|
||||
2. **Linear Independence:** Vandermonde matrix is non-singular for distinct nodes
|
||||
3. **Interpolation Property:** Follows directly from $\mathbf{V} \boldsymbol{\alpha}_i = \mathbf{e}_i$
|
||||
|
||||
### Derivatives
|
||||
|
||||
Once we have $N_i(\xi, \eta, \zeta)$ symbolically, derivatives are straightforward:
|
||||
|
||||
$$\frac{\partial N_i}{\partial \xi}, \frac{\partial N_i}{\partial \eta}, \frac{\partial N_i}{\partial \zeta}$$
|
||||
|
||||
These are computed **once** symbolically, then **pre-compiled** into efficient Julia code.
|
||||
|
||||
## Standard Lagrange Elements in JuliaFEM
|
||||
|
||||
### 1D Elements
|
||||
- **Seg2**: Linear (2 nodes)
|
||||
- **Seg3**: Quadratic (3 nodes, mid-edge node)
|
||||
|
||||
### 2D Elements
|
||||
- **Tri3**: Linear triangle (3 corner nodes)
|
||||
- **Tri6**: Quadratic triangle (6 nodes: 3 corners + 3 mid-edges)
|
||||
- **Quad4**: Bilinear quadrilateral (4 corner nodes)
|
||||
- **Quad8**: Serendipity quadrilateral (8 nodes: 4 corners + 4 mid-edges)
|
||||
- **Quad9**: Biquadratic quadrilateral (9 nodes: 4 corners + 4 mid-edges + 1 center)
|
||||
|
||||
### 3D Elements
|
||||
- **Tet4**: Linear tetrahedron (4 corner nodes)
|
||||
- **Tet10**: Quadratic tetrahedron (10 nodes: 4 corners + 6 mid-edges)
|
||||
- **Hex8**: Trilinear hexahedron (8 corner nodes)
|
||||
- **Hex20**: Serendipity hexahedron (20 nodes: 8 corners + 12 mid-edges)
|
||||
- **Hex27**: Triquadratic hexahedron (27 nodes: full tensor product)
|
||||
- **Pyr5**: Linear pyramid (5 nodes)
|
||||
- **Wedge6**: Linear wedge/prism (6 nodes)
|
||||
- **Wedge15**: Quadratic wedge (15 nodes)
|
||||
|
||||
## Pre-Generation vs Runtime Generation
|
||||
|
||||
### Historical Approach (JuliaFEM ≤ 0.5.1)
|
||||
|
||||
```julia
|
||||
# At package load time:
|
||||
create_basis_and_eval(:Tet10, "...", coords, ansatz)
|
||||
# - Builds Vandermonde matrix
|
||||
# - Solves n linear systems
|
||||
# - Symbolic differentiation
|
||||
# - Simplification
|
||||
# - Code generation with eval()
|
||||
# Result: __precompile__(false) - slow loading
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Problems:**
|
||||
- ❌ Symbolic math every package load (100+ ms)
|
||||
- ❌ Cannot precompile (`eval()` at module scope)
|
||||
- ❌ Opaque code generation
|
||||
- ❌ Hard to debug
|
||||
|
||||
### Modern Approach (JuliaFEM ≥ 1.0)
|
||||
|
||||
```julia
|
||||
# Once, during development:
|
||||
scripts/generate_lagrange_basis.jl
|
||||
# - Computes all bases symbolically
|
||||
# - Writes clean Julia code to src/basis/lagrange_generated.jl
|
||||
|
||||
# At package load time:
|
||||
include("basis/lagrange_generated.jl")
|
||||
# - Just parses pre-written Julia code
|
||||
# - Fully precompilable
|
||||
# - Zero symbolic computation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Benefits:**
|
||||
- ✅ Instant package loading
|
||||
- ✅ Full precompilation
|
||||
- ✅ Readable generated code
|
||||
- ✅ Easy to debug
|
||||
- ✅ Version controlled (can review changes)
|
||||
|
||||
## Numerical Stability
|
||||
|
||||
### Vandermonde Matrix Conditioning
|
||||
|
||||
The Vandermonde matrix can be ill-conditioned for:
|
||||
- High-order polynomials ($p > 5$)
|
||||
- Poorly distributed nodes
|
||||
- Reference elements far from unit cube/simplex
|
||||
|
||||
**JuliaFEM's approach:**
|
||||
- Use canonical reference elements (unit cube $[-1,1]^d$ or unit simplex)
|
||||
- Lagrange elements rarely exceed order 3 in practice
|
||||
- For high-order: Consider hierarchical bases (not Lagrange)
|
||||
|
||||
### Verification
|
||||
|
||||
Generated basis functions are verified by:
|
||||
1. **Kronecker delta property:** $N_i(\mathbf{x}_j) = \delta_{ij}$
|
||||
2. **Partition of unity:** $\sum_i N_i(\mathbf{x}) = 1$ everywhere
|
||||
3. **Derivative correctness:** Compare symbolic vs AD
|
||||
|
||||
See `test/test_basis_functions.jl` for comprehensive tests.
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
1. Hughes, T.J.R., "The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis", Dover, 2000
|
||||
2. Zienkiewicz, O.C. and Taylor, R.L., "The Finite Element Method", Volumes 1-3, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000
|
||||
3. Szabó, B. and Babuška, I., "Finite Element Analysis", Wiley, 1991
|
||||
|
||||
## See Also
|
||||
|
||||
- `scripts/generate_lagrange_basis.jl` - Generation script
|
||||
- `src/basis/lagrange_generated.jl` - Generated code (do not edit manually)
|
||||
- `src/basis/lagrange_generator.jl` - Generator functions (symbolic engine)
|
||||
- `benchmarks/tet10_derivatives_benchmark.jl` - Performance analysis (manual vs AD)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user