Files
JuliaFEM.jl/docs/book/lagrange_basis_functions.md
T
Jukka Aho 626266c990 docs: Reorganize documentation into three-tier structure
**Three Manuals for Three Audiences:**

1. **User Manual** (docs/user/) - "Just Get It Done"
   - For end users, engineers, students
   - Simple, practical, step-by-step
   - Quick start, tutorials, examples, troubleshooting
   - Philosophy: Show me how to solve my problem

2. **Contributor Manual** (docs/contributor/) - "Show Me the Code"
   - For developers, contributors, advanced users
   - Technical, detailed, design rationale
   - Testing, architecture, performance, CI/CD
   - Philosophy: Explain HOW and WHY

3. **The JuliaFEM Book** (docs/book/) - "Let Me Show You How I Think"
   - For researchers, theory nerds, and Jukka
   - Comprehensive, educational, opinionated, personal
   - Math foundations, design philosophy, history, research
   - Philosophy: Mix theory, code, and personal experience

**Reorganization:**
- Moved: TESTING_PHILOSOPHY.md → contributor/testing_philosophy.md
- Moved: STATUS.md → contributor/status.md
- Moved: TEST_FIXES_NEEDED.md → contributor/test_fixes_needed.md
- Moved: lagrange_basis_functions.md → book/lagrange_basis_functions.md
- Moved: benchmarks/ → book/benchmarks/
- Created: docs/README.md (main index explaining structure)
- Created: README.md in each section explaining audience and contents
- Updated: All references in scripts and source files

**Naming:** All docs now lowercase (testing_philosophy not TESTING_PHILOSOPHY)

**Benefits:**
- Clear separation of concerns
- Users don't get overwhelmed with implementation details
- Contributors get technical depth
- Book preserves deep theory and personal insights
- Each manual optimized for its audience

**Next:** Populate each section with appropriate content
2025-11-09 04:38:28 +02:00

7.2 KiB

Lagrange Basis Functions in JuliaFEM

Date: November 9, 2025
Author: JuliaFEM Development Team

Introduction

Lagrange basis functions are the foundation of the Finite Element Method. They provide a systematic way to construct polynomial interpolation functions that satisfy the Kronecker delta property: the basis function associated with node i equals 1 at that node and 0 at all other nodes.

N_i(\mathbf{x}_j) = \delta_{ij} = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if } i = j \\ 0 & \text{if } i \neq j \end{cases}

This property makes it trivial to interpolate field values: u(\mathbf{x}) = \sum_i u_i N_i(\mathbf{x}) where u_i are nodal values.

Mathematical Foundation

Vandermonde Matrix Method

Given:

  • n nodes with coordinates \{\mathbf{x}_1, \mathbf{x}_2, \ldots, \mathbf{x}_n\} in reference element
  • A polynomial basis (ansatz) \{p_1(\mathbf{x}), p_2(\mathbf{x}), \ldots, p_n(\mathbf{x})\}

We seek coefficients \alpha_{ij} such that:

N_i(\mathbf{x}) = \sum_{j=1}^{n} \alpha_{ij} p_j(\mathbf{x})

The Kronecker delta property gives us:

N_i(\mathbf{x}_k) = \sum_{j=1}^{n} \alpha_{ij} p_j(\mathbf{x}_k) = \delta_{ik}

This is a linear system: \mathbf{V} \boldsymbol{\alpha}_i = \mathbf{e}_i

Where the Vandermonde matrix is:

V_{kj} = p_j(\mathbf{x}_k)

And \mathbf{e}_i is the $i$-th unit vector.

Example: 1D Linear Element (Seg2)

Ansatz: p(\xi) = 1 + \xi (complete linear polynomial)

Nodes: \xi_1 = 0, \xi_2 = 1

Vandermonde matrix:

$$\mathbf{V} = \begin{bmatrix} p_1(\xi_1) & p_2(\xi_1) \ p_1(\xi_2) & p_2(\xi_2) \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$$

Solve for N_1: \mathbf{V} \boldsymbol{\alpha}_1 = [1, 0]^T

\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \alpha_{11} \\ \alpha_{12} \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}

Solution: \alpha_{11} = 1, \alpha_{12} = -1

Therefore: N_1(\xi) = 1 \cdot 1 + (-1) \cdot \xi = 1 - \xi

Solve for N_2: \mathbf{V} \boldsymbol{\alpha}_2 = [0, 1]^T

Solution: \alpha_{21} = 0, \alpha_{22} = 1

Therefore: N_2(\xi) = 0 \cdot 1 + 1 \cdot \xi = \xi

Verification:

  • N_1(0) = 1, N_1(1) = 0
  • N_2(0) = 0, N_2(1) = 1
  • N_1(\xi) + N_2(\xi) = 1 (partition of unity) ✓

Polynomial Completeness

The ansatz polynomial must be complete to the desired order:

Order 1D 2D 3D Nodes Required
Linear 1 + \xi 1 + \xi + \eta 1 + \xi + \eta + \zeta d+1
Quadratic 1 + \xi + \xi^2 1 + \xi + \eta + \xi^2 + \xi\eta + \eta^2 ... (d+1)(d+2)/2

Example for 2D Triangle (Tri3):

Ansatz: p(\xi, \eta) = 1 + \xi + \eta (complete linear in 2D)

This is the minimal complete polynomial for 3 nodes.

Implementation in JuliaFEM

Automatic Generation Process

# 1. Define element geometry
coords = [(0.0, 0.0), (1.0, 0.0), (0.0, 1.0)]  # Tri3 nodes

# 2. Define ansatz polynomial
ansatz = :(1 + u + v)  # Complete linear in 2D

# 3. Build Vandermonde matrix
V[i,j] = eval_polynomial_term(ansatz_terms[j], coords[i])

# 4. For each node i:
coeffs = V \ e_i  # Solve linear system
N_i = sum(coeffs[j] * ansatz_terms[j])  # Construct basis function

# 5. Symbolic differentiation
∂N_i/∂ξ = differentiate(N_i, :u)
∂N_i/∂η = differentiate(N_i, :v)

Why This Works

  1. Completeness: Ansatz spans full polynomial space of given order
  2. Linear Independence: Vandermonde matrix is non-singular for distinct nodes
  3. Interpolation Property: Follows directly from \mathbf{V} \boldsymbol{\alpha}_i = \mathbf{e}_i

Derivatives

Once we have N_i(\xi, \eta, \zeta) symbolically, derivatives are straightforward:

\frac{\partial N_i}{\partial \xi}, \frac{\partial N_i}{\partial \eta}, \frac{\partial N_i}{\partial \zeta}

These are computed once symbolically, then pre-compiled into efficient Julia code.

Standard Lagrange Elements in JuliaFEM

1D Elements

  • Seg2: Linear (2 nodes)
  • Seg3: Quadratic (3 nodes, mid-edge node)

2D Elements

  • Tri3: Linear triangle (3 corner nodes)
  • Tri6: Quadratic triangle (6 nodes: 3 corners + 3 mid-edges)
  • Quad4: Bilinear quadrilateral (4 corner nodes)
  • Quad8: Serendipity quadrilateral (8 nodes: 4 corners + 4 mid-edges)
  • Quad9: Biquadratic quadrilateral (9 nodes: 4 corners + 4 mid-edges + 1 center)

3D Elements

  • Tet4: Linear tetrahedron (4 corner nodes)
  • Tet10: Quadratic tetrahedron (10 nodes: 4 corners + 6 mid-edges)
  • Hex8: Trilinear hexahedron (8 corner nodes)
  • Hex20: Serendipity hexahedron (20 nodes: 8 corners + 12 mid-edges)
  • Hex27: Triquadratic hexahedron (27 nodes: full tensor product)
  • Pyr5: Linear pyramid (5 nodes)
  • Wedge6: Linear wedge/prism (6 nodes)
  • Wedge15: Quadratic wedge (15 nodes)

Pre-Generation vs Runtime Generation

Historical Approach (JuliaFEM ≤ 0.5.1)

# At package load time:
create_basis_and_eval(:Tet10, "...", coords, ansatz)
# - Builds Vandermonde matrix
# - Solves n linear systems
# - Symbolic differentiation
# - Simplification
# - Code generation with eval()
# Result: __precompile__(false) - slow loading

Problems:

  • Symbolic math every package load (100+ ms)
  • Cannot precompile (eval() at module scope)
  • Opaque code generation
  • Hard to debug

Modern Approach (JuliaFEM ≥ 1.0)

# Once, during development:
scripts/generate_lagrange_basis.jl
# - Computes all bases symbolically
# - Writes clean Julia code to src/basis/lagrange_generated.jl

# At package load time:
include("basis/lagrange_generated.jl")
# - Just parses pre-written Julia code
# - Fully precompilable
# - Zero symbolic computation

Benefits:

  • Instant package loading
  • Full precompilation
  • Readable generated code
  • Easy to debug
  • Version controlled (can review changes)

Numerical Stability

Vandermonde Matrix Conditioning

The Vandermonde matrix can be ill-conditioned for:

  • High-order polynomials (p > 5)
  • Poorly distributed nodes
  • Reference elements far from unit cube/simplex

JuliaFEM's approach:

  • Use canonical reference elements (unit cube [-1,1]^d or unit simplex)
  • Lagrange elements rarely exceed order 3 in practice
  • For high-order: Consider hierarchical bases (not Lagrange)

Verification

Generated basis functions are verified by:

  1. Kronecker delta property: N_i(\mathbf{x}_j) = \delta_{ij}
  2. Partition of unity: \sum_i N_i(\mathbf{x}) = 1 everywhere
  3. Derivative correctness: Compare symbolic vs AD

See test/test_basis_functions.jl for comprehensive tests.

References

  1. Hughes, T.J.R., "The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis", Dover, 2000
  2. Zienkiewicz, O.C. and Taylor, R.L., "The Finite Element Method", Volumes 1-3, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000
  3. Szabó, B. and Babuška, I., "Finite Element Analysis", Wiley, 1991

See Also

  • scripts/generate_lagrange_basis.jl - Generation script
  • src/basis/lagrange_generated.jl - Generated code (do not edit manually)
  • src/basis/lagrange_generator.jl - Generator functions (symbolic engine)
  • benchmarks/tet10_derivatives_benchmark.jl - Performance analysis (manual vs AD)