This commit is contained in:
Andrej730
2024-09-24 19:29:25 +05:00
parent 36b4225b18
commit 7045fba9c0
4 changed files with 10 additions and 11 deletions
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ class PolylineOperator:
if event.value == "RELEASE" and event.type == "LEFTMOUSE":
result = tool.Snap.insert_polyline_point(self.input_ui)
if result:
self.report({'WARNING'}, result)
self.report({"WARNING"}, result)
tool.Blender.update_viewport()
if event.value == "PRESS" and event.type == "C":
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ class PolylineOperator:
if is_valid:
result = tool.Snap.insert_polyline_point(self.input_ui)
if result:
self.report({'WARNING'}, result)
self.report({"WARNING"}, result)
self.tool_state.mode = "Mouse"
self.tool_state.is_input_on = False
+1 -1
View File
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ class Raycast(bonsai.core.tool.Raycast):
rv3d = context.region_data
original_perspective = rv3d.view_perspective
# TODO The raycast was working for orthographic view, but not when you are inside a camera view. This solution feels hacky,
# TODO The raycast was working for orthographic view, but not when you are inside a camera view. This solution feels hacky,
# but it temporarily switches the perspective_matrix from camera to the perspective_matrix from ortho view.
if original_perspective == "CAMERA":
rv3d.view_perspective = "ORTHO"
+4 -2
View File
@@ -137,13 +137,15 @@ class Snap(bonsai.core.tool.Snap):
polyline_data = bpy.context.scene.BIMPolylineProperties.polyline_point
if polyline_data:
# Avoids creating two points at the same location
for point in polyline_data[1:]: # The first can be repeated to form a wall loop
for point in polyline_data[1:]: # The first can be repeated to form a wall loop
if (x, y, z) == (point.x, point.y, point.z):
return "Cannot create two points at the same location"
print(type(snap_vertex))
print(type(polyline_data[-1]))
# Avoids creating segments smaller then 0.1. This is a limitation from create_wall_from_2_points
length = (Vector((x, y, z)) - Vector((polyline_data[-1].x, polyline_data[-1].y, polyline_data[-1].z))).length
length = (
Vector((x, y, z)) - Vector((polyline_data[-1].x, polyline_data[-1].y, polyline_data[-1].z))
).length
if length < 0.1:
return "Cannot create a segment smaller then 10cm"
@@ -308,8 +308,7 @@ def get_product_quantity_names(elements: list[ifcopenshell.entity_instance]) ->
def get_cost_schedule(cost_item: ifcopenshell.entity_instance) -> ifcopenshell.entity_instance:
"""Returns the cost schedule of a cost item.
"""
"""Returns the cost schedule of a cost item."""
for rel in cost_item.HasAssignments or []:
if rel.is_a("IfcRelAssignsToControl") and rel.RelatingControl.is_a("IfcCostSchedule"):
return rel.RelatingControl
@@ -320,12 +319,10 @@ def get_cost_schedule(cost_item: ifcopenshell.entity_instance) -> ifcopenshell.e
def get_cost_rate(
file: ifcopenshell_wrapper.file, cost_item: ifcopenshell.entity_instance
) -> Optional[ifcopenshell.entity_instance]:
"""Returns the cost rate of a cost item.
"""
"""Returns the cost rate of a cost item."""
# There is no direct relationship between a cost item and a cost rate in IFC, so we need to infer it, based on the assumption that cost_rate.CostValues == cost_item.CostValues.
if get_cost_schedule(cost_item).PredefinedType == "SCHEDULEOFRATES":
return None # Cost item is already a cost rate
return None # Cost item is already a cost rate
if cost_item.CostValues:
potential_rates = file.get_inverse(cost_item.CostValues[0])
for potential_rate in potential_rates: