The code was recalculating type_elements and relating_type_id every time Blender trying to check enum items.
Couldn't replicate issue when type duplicated, perhaps it's resolved some other way already.
relating_type_id now relies on type_elements which relies on ifc_class_current and they wasn't updated when ifc_class was changed.
Typical failing test looked like "TypeError: bpy_struct: item.attr = val: expected a string enum, not int".
If data was already loaded for BIMTool ("all") this ` elif ifc_element_type == "all" and AuthoringData.data["ifc_element_type"] is not None:` would always fail and this `AuthoringData.data["ifc_element_type"] != ifc_element_type` would always result to True, constantly recalculating data on every draw call.
This may uncover some issues that were hidden by the constant update (e.g. the bug fixed in the next commit).
Simplified it so now ifc_element_type is almost always referring to either ifc class or None. It's still using "all" in the BIMTool itself but then it's converted to None when passed to draw methods.
Currently you can edit container name directly from spatial manager, so this operator is no longer needed (and it also was missing from UI either way).
Fixes mapping of vertical alignment parabola business logic to geometry. Adds creation function of h and v alignment. Adds stationing referent at start of alignment. Fixes utility functions
(I hope I don't miss anything, no tests seem to fail and performance is increased significantly) but because `subelement_queue` initiated with the `traverse` all `element`'s subelements will be traversed inside `while` loop twice - once as a part of initial queue and another time when `element` is traversed inside the loop and all those elements added to the queue again.
Now we just initiate the `queue` with the `element` and it will be traversed inside the loop like any other element.
1) `do_not_delete` performs best when it's set
2) also_consider when `element` related elements go first, so there will be no need to traverse all other elements to see if they cover `element`'s inverses.
1) replaced walk with traverse(max_levels=1)
2) early return if there total_inverses == 0
3) early return if also_considered_inverses is enough to cover total_inverses
Andrej730