Sync children was a bit odd because it's not actually an "array
parameter" per se, just a way to regenerate. It's now an operator.
There was a deeper issue I encountered where the way arrays work is that
they duplicate the parent element. (first encountered in e51d2d )
However, the duplication code has special array handling too. To avoid
issues with this cyclical coupling the previous solution was to
reimplement object duplication (with all sorts of pitfalls that has).
Now, I've tried to decouple it further by clearing all array psets prior
to any change, and readding the pset after everything has been
regenerated.
This can be improved upon but I don't feel confident until there is more
comprehensive test coverage for the duplicate operator.
This has a few advantages:
- The collection logic is centralised
- The collection logic is configurable based on the collection mode
- The name is not hardcoded
This reimplements @theoryshaw 's commit 9adbd4 but has a few upgrades:
- Considers all parent / child relationships, not just aggregates
- Puts business logic in core where it belongs and tool code in tool
- Uses existing utils where possible like get_decomposition
- Does not use name based collection checking which is fragile
- Reuses tool.Collector
- Makes container assignment handle the API's capability to do things
in bulk instead of one by one in a loop, so it's faster
- Tests
This is a cool idea, but users have all sorts of Blender collection
strategies and I think it's a good idea for Bonsai code to just touch
Bonsai's stuff and leave everything else. Separate functionality can be
built for non-Bonsai workflows and preferrably in a more discoverable
way than in individual Bonsai features.
When joining objects with mismatched representation types, deselect and
skip incompatible objects rather than canceling the entire operation.
This allows users to join compatible objects even when the selection
includes incompatible ones.
The previous fix by @theoryshaw had the correct conclusion but had some
issues:
1. Don't implement anything that fetches IFC data in the UI draw calls.
This historically has lead to race conditions and crashes. The data
classes are much preferred.
2. Rather than load the inapplicable attribute then selectively omit it
in the UI, it's preferred to just never load it in the first place.
Reuse tool.Geometry.duplicate_ifc_objects because that's where all
duplication logic should stay instead of half reimplementing it every
time which introduces subtle bugs.
I generally like to minimise knobs and dials, so this is now part of the
wizard but now defaults to a "NONE" unit. You also now have the option
to choose "NONE" for area / volume units which makes things consistent.
Enum names also match the IFC lowercase convention for conversion based
units. This also simplifies the core logic and treats all units the same
way instead of special cases for each unit type. (length is still
special and required in Bonsai as we are inherently graphical)
Demo - https://files.catbox.moe/extsxf.mp4
But now it requires ifcsverchok graph to be nested inside a subgroup because we need a way to indicate which graph parameters are important, so user can modify them from Parametric Geometry tab without actually explicitly opening sverchok graph.
This reverts commit 96fe9b5398.
This commit contains a logical error where hide_viewport is checked in
the if statement but hide_set() is used as the effect. This causes a
regression in tests about project visibility. `hide_viewport` is the
correct hiding setting to use, because hide_set is more ephemeral and
affected by Shift-H, Alt-H etc.
Previously, when the add occurrence modal operator was executed, on
every modal loop (i.e. every mouse movement) it would fetch the mesh
geometry to be previewed, store the verts / edges / faces in mesh
collections, then the decorator would fetch that geometry, the clear the
collections, in a loop.
I've removed the Blender collections. Instead the same strategy is used
as in ItemDecorator i.e. the mesh and verts are fetched once during
decorator installation, then on each draw call only a single vertex loop
to multiply by the transformation matrix for snapping and mouse
position.
You can test with the LOD400 model in #7566. On my machine it would
cause lag on anything with >500 faces. Now it seems to work without lag
on a 26k polygon mesh.
Dion Moult